QOD: The True and Progressive Role of Charter Schools

James Merriman, head of the NYC Charter School Center,  takes note of the  “velvet ropes” of New York City’s gifted and talented public schools where “thousands of New York City families,” mostly low-income, “have their noses pressed against the glass of public establishments their children are not able to enter.” In fact, “in middle and high school [in NYC], fully one in three seats are in schools with a selective admissions process.”

He continues,

Most elementary schools admit students from a neighborhood enrollment zone, but these zones reflect the same dramatic inequalities of access as the housing market itself. As Senator Elizabeth Warren recently wrote, “Schools in middle-class neighborhoods may be labeled ‘public,’ but parents have paid for tuition by purchasing a $175,000 home within a carefully selected school district.” 

(To see the private side of public education, just try changing the lines of an affluent school zone and listen to parents describe how much they spent to buy their way into the school zone.) 

In the context of such a deeply stratified system, it’s easier to judge the true role played by public charter schools, all of which admit their students by random lottery and without regard to academic record — except when, as ever more frequently happens, they request and receive an exemption to give preferences to students at risk of academic failure, such as students who are in foster care or who are behind academically.
As a result, and despite a lot of rhetoric to the contrary, most of it by the teachers unions and their paid-for front groups, charter schools serve a genuinely progressive function, providing disadvantaged families some of the city’s best combinations of accessibility and quality.

What do you think?

More Comments